Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach

  • Authors:
  • Kwai-Sang Chin;Ying-Ming Wang;Gary Ka Kwai Poon;Jian-Bo Yang

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong;School of Public Administration, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, PR China;Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong;Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester M15 6PB, UK

  • Venue:
  • Computers and Operations Research
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.02

Visualization

Abstract

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a methodology to evaluate a system, design, process or service for possible ways in which failures (problems, errors, risks and concerns) can occur. It is a group decision function and cannot be done on an individual basis. The FMEA team often demonstrates different opinions and knowledge from one team member to another and produces different types of assessment information such as complete and incomplete, precise and imprecise and known and unknown because of its cross-functional and multidisciplinary nature. These different types of information are very difficult to incorporate into the FMEA by the traditional risk priority number (RPN) model and fuzzy rule-based approximate reasoning methodologies. In this paper we present an FMEA using the evidential reasoning (ER) approach, a newly developed methodology for multiple attribute decision analysis. The proposed FMEA is then illustrated with an application to a fishing vessel. As is illustrated by the numerical example, the proposed FMEA can well capture FMEA team members' diversity opinions and prioritize failure modes under different types of uncertainties.