Review: Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review

  • Authors:

  • Hu-Chen Liu;Long Liu;Nan Liu

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan;College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, PR China;School of Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, PR China

  • Venue:
  • Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 12.05

Visualization

Abstract

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a risk assessment tool that mitigates potential failures in systems, processes, designs or services and has been used in a wide range of industries. The conventional risk priority number (RPN) method has been criticized to have many deficiencies and various risk priority models have been proposed in the literature to enhance the performance of FMEA. However, there has been no literature review on this topic. In this study, we reviewed 75 FMEA papers published between 1992 and 2012 in the international journals and categorized them according to the approaches used to overcome the limitations of the conventional RPN method. The intention of this review is to address the following three questions: (i) Which shortcomings attract the most attention? (ii) Which approaches are the most popular? (iii) Is there any inadequacy of the approaches? The answers to these questions will give an indication of current trends in research and the best direction for future research in order to further address the known deficiencies associated with the traditional FMEA.