Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations
Journal of Computational Physics
ICIAP '03 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing
Image Processing Based on Partial Differential Equations: Proceedings of the International Conference on PDE-Based Image Processing and Related Inverse ... 8-12, 2005 (Mathematics and Visualization)
Level set methods for watershed image segmentation
SSVM'07 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Scale space and variational methods in computer vision
Towards automated cellular image segmentation for RNAi genome-wide screening
MICCAI'05 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - Volume Part I
Automatic Segmentation of High-Throughput RNAi Fluorescent Cellular Images
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Segmentation of Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Nuclei within 3-D Neurospheres
ISVC '09 Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Advances in Visual Computing: Part I
Automatic analysis of leishmania infected microscopy images via gaussian mixture models
SBIA'12 Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Segmentation of cellular images presents a challenging task for computer vision, especially when the cells of irregular shapes clump together. Level set methods can segment cells with irregular shapes when signal-to-noise ratio is low, however they could not effectively segment cells that are clumping together. We perform topological analysis on the zero level sets to enable effective segmentation of clumped cells. Geometrical shapes and intensities are important information for segmentation of cells. We assimilated them in our approach and hence we are able to gain from the advantages of level sets while circumventing its shortcoming. Validation on a data set of 4916 neural cells shows that our method is 93.3 ±0.6% accurate.