An analysis of scripts generated in writing between users and computer consultants

  • Authors:
  • David Chin

  • Affiliations:
  • University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

  • Venue:
  • AFIPS '84 Proceedings of the July 9-12, 1984, national computer conference and exposition
  • Year:
  • 1984

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The scripts generated in written interactive communications between users and a computer consultant program were investigated in a controlled experiment. The program was a simulation of UC, the UNIX Consultant, which users believed to be the actual program. An analysis of the scripts generated while solving a predefined set of problems showed the heavy use of context in forms such as ellipsis, anaphora, indirect speech acts, and grammatically incomplete sentences in over one-quarter of input clauses. Also present were grammatically ill-formed constructions and spelling errors. A comparison with a control group of users solving the same problem set with human consultants showed that the control group relied on context about twice as much as the simulation group. This suggests that people naturally use context in language and that the simulation group tried to rely less on context because they believed that they were speaking to a computer. Even so, contextual information is essential to understanding a large part of the simulation group's input.