Modelling social action for AI agents
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue: artificial intelligence 40 years later
The BOID architecture: conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires
Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents
Action-based alternating transition systems for arguments about action
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Engineering open environments with electronic institutions
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning
DEON'06 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems
Understanding compliance differences between legal and social norms: the case of smoking ban
AAMAS'11 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Advanced Agent Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The social laws paradigm represents an important approach to the co-ordination of behaviour in multi-agent systems. In this paper we examine the relationship between social laws and rational behaviour, by which we mean behaviour that can be justified by a defensible argument. We describe how social laws have previously been defined and used within the context of Action-Based Alternating Transition Systems (AATSs). We then show how an account of argumentation for practical reasoning in agent systems, also based on AATSs, can be used to determine what is rational for the agents to do in the absence and presence of such laws. The reasoning involved is both of a practical and epistemic nature: agents need to make decisions about what to do based upon the assumptions that they make about the states they find themselves in, and crucially, they also need to reason about what the other agents in the scenario will do. What is rational for the agents to do has implications for the need for social laws, the ways in which social laws can help the situation, the form the social laws should take, and the likelihood of compliance with the social laws. This paper demonstrates how we can think about social laws and rational behaviour in a single framework, so as to identify these implications in particular scenarios, and so frame social laws accordingly.