Alternating-time temporal logic
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Audiences in argumentation frameworks
Artificial Intelligence
Co-ordination and Co-operation in Agent Systems: Social Laws and Argumentation
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Modelling State Intervention in Cases of Conflicting Interests
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference
Automating Argumentation for Deliberation in Cases of Conflict of Interest
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Action-based alternating transition systems for arguments about action
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Practical reasoning using values: giving meaning to values
ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, following the work of Hare, we consider moral reasoning not as the application of moral norms and principles, but as reasoning about what ought to be done in a particular situation, with moral norms perhaps emerging from this reasoning. We model this situated reasoning drawing on our previous work on argumentation schemes, here set in the context of Action-Based Alternating Transition Systems. We distinguish what prudentially ought to be done from what morally ought to be done, consider what legislation might be appropriate and characterise the differences between morally correct, morally praiseworthy and morally excusable actions.