Strategic directions in concurrency research
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) - Special ACM 50th-anniversary issue: strategic directions in computing research
A research manifesto for services science
Communications of the ACM - Services science
Field review: Complex systems: Network thinking
Artificial Intelligence
Modeling of driver's collision avoidance maneuver based on controller switching model
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Recently, technology roadmaps have been actively constructed by various organizations such as governments, industry segments, academic societies and companies [1]. While the common basic purpose of these roadmaps is sharing common recognition of the technology among stakeholders, there exists a specific role for each organization. One of the important roles of academic societies is to show the directions in which society is moving. The IEICE technical group on Concurrent System Technology (CST) established in 1993 stands at a turning point and needs to move forward in new directions after more than a decade of activities and contributions. However, neither top-down (market-pull/requirements-pull) nor bottom-up (technology-push) roadmapping is suitable for CST because CST is a kind of systems engineering. This paper proposes a new technology roadmapping methodology (middle-up-down technology roadmapping) for systems engineering and shows three future directions of CST and one roadmap for service systems that integrate CST and services science.