Dynamic update of Java applications—balancing change flexibility vs programming transparency

  • Authors:

  • Allan Raundahl Gregersen;Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen

  • Affiliations:

  • The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark;The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice - Special Issue on the 12th Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2008)
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The ability to dynamically change the behavior of an application is becoming an important issue in contemporary rich client software development. Not only can programmers benefit from dynamic updates during the development of concurrent applications where recreation of complex application states can be avoided during test and debugging but also at post-deployment time where applications can be updated transparently without going through the well-known halt, redeploy and restart scheme. In this paper, we explain how our dynamic update framework achieves transparent dynamic updates of running Java applications while guaranteeing both type and thread safety. A novel feature of our approach is that it supports full redefinition of classes by allowing changes to the type hierarchy. Our approach is based on a lightweight runtime system, which is injected into an application via bytecode transformations at class loading. We show how our approach can add dynamic update capabilities to rich client development by integrating it with the NetBeans rich client platform. Performance experiments on our NetBeans implementation show that the overhead of our approach is low when applied to component application programming interface classes. To the best of our knowledge no other existing approach achieves the same level of low overhead and programming transparency. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.