Face Recognition: The Problem of Compensating for Changes in Illumination Direction
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
From Few to Many: Illumination Cone Models for Face Recognition under Variable Lighting and Pose
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection
ECCV '96 Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Computer Vision-Volume I - Volume I
Robust Face Detection Using the Hausdorff Distance
AVBPA '01 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication
Photometric Normalisation for Component-based Face Verification
FGR '06 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition
Personal recognition based on an image of the palmar surface of the hand
Pattern Recognition
A fast and robust method for the identification of face landmarks in profile images
WSEAS Transactions on Computers
Automatic real time localization of frowning and smiling faces under controlled head rotations
WSEAS Transactions on Signal Processing
An image preprocessing algorithm for illumination invariant face recognition
AVBPA'03 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Audio- and video-based biometric person authentication
A multiscale retinex for bridging the gap between color images and the human observation of scenes
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
An introduction to biometric recognition
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
The complete gabor-fisher classifier for robust face recognition
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing - Special issue on advanced image processing for defense and security applications
Journal of Real-Time Image Processing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Image preprocessing techniques represent an essential part of a face recognition systems, which has a great impact on the performance and robustness of the recognition procedure. Amongst the number of techniques already presented in the literature, histogram equalization has emerged as the dominant preprocessing technique and is regularly used for the task of face recognition. With the property of increasing the global contrast of the facial image while simultaneously compensating for the illumination conditions present at the image acquisition stage, it represents a useful preprocessing step, which can ensure enhanced and more robust recognition performance. Even though, more elaborate normalization techniques, such as the multiscale retinex technique, isotropic and anisotropic smoothing, have been introduced to field of face recognition, they have been found to be more of a complement than a real substitute for histogram equalization. However, by closer examining the characteristics of histogram equalization, one can quickly discover that it represents only a specific case of a more general concept of histogram remapping techniques (which may have similar characteristics as histogram equalization does). While histogram equalization remapps the histogram of a given facial image to a uniform distribution, the target distribution could easily be replaced with an arbitrary one. As there is no theoretical justification of why the uniform distribution should be preferred to other target distributions, the question arises: how do other (non-uniform) target distributions influence the face recognition process and are they better suited for the recognition task. To tackle this issues, we present in this paper an empirical assessment of the concept of histogram remapping with the following target distributions: the uniform, the normal, the lognormal and the exponential distribution. We perform comparative experiments on the publicly available XM2VTS and YaleB databases and conclude that similar or even better recognition results that those ensured by histogram equalization can be achieved when other (non-uniform) target distribution are considered for the histogram remapping. This enhanced performance, however, comes at a price, as the nonuniform distributions rely on some parameters which have to be trained or selected appropriately to achieve the optimal performance.