Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Diagramming the Argument Interchange Format
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Intelligent evaluation of evidence using Wigmore diagrams
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Semi-automatic creation of Wigmore Diagrams
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In the early 20th century, J.H. Wigmore described a new method for analysing and laying out arguments in legal cases. His proposal was the first system of argument diagramming, and it is still in use in jurisprudence today. Wigmore diagrams offer a rich ontology of argumentation concepts which in some respects are close to ideas in other, more modern systems of argument analysis and argument diagramming --whilst in other areas, is much richer and more specific than alternatives. The features of Wigmore analyses might reasonably be expected to contribute to modern, computational approaches to argument, both in the legal domain and more broadly. This paper explores some of the key issues in representing Wigmore analyses and translating between them and other systems of analysis such as those founded upon Toulmin models and scheme-based models.