Diagramming the Argument Interchange Format

Authors:
Glenn Rowe;Chris Reed
Affiliations:
School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, U.K.;School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, U.K.
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Year:
2008

Citing 6
Cited 2

Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument

Journal of Logic and Computation
Towards an argument interchange format

The Knowledge Engineering Review
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof

Artificial Intelligence
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web

Artificial Intelligence
Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence

The Knowledge Engineering Review
Translating Wigmore Diagrams

Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006

On a computational argumentation framework for agent societies

ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
ArgCBROnto: a knowledge representation formalism for case-based argumentation

AT'13 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Agreement Technologies

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We propose some standards and rules by which clear, uncluttered diagrams of arguments incorporating all the rules and attributes defined by the Argument Interchange Format (AIF) can be created. We consider issues arising from the production of general directed graph diagrams. We also define updated rules for translating between Standard, Wigmore and Toulmin diagrams that are consistent with an interpretation in terms of AIF.