Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systems

Authors:
Claudette Cayrol;Caroline Devred;Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex
Affiliations:
IRIT, UPS, 31062 Toulouse, Cédex 9, {ccayrol, lagasq}@irit.fr;CRIL, Université d'Artois, 62307 Lens, Cédex, devred@cril.univ-artois.fr;IRIT, UPS, 31062 Toulouse, Cédex 9, {ccayrol, lagasq}@irit.fr
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Year:
2006

Citing 9
Cited 5

The acceptability semantics for logic programs

Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Logic programming
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system

Information Systems
Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents

AAMAS '03 Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency

Artificial Intelligence
Prudent Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks

ICTAI '05 Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
Inference from controversial arguments

LPAR'05 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning
Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks

ECSQARU'05 Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks

ECSQARU'05 Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

Argumentation in artificial intelligence

Artificial Intelligence
On the relevance of utterances in formal inter-agent dialogues

Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Towards an Extensible Argumentation System

ECSQARU '07 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Semantics for Evidence-Based Argumentation

Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
On the relevance of utterances in formal inter-agent dialogues

ArgMAS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We consider bipolar argumentation frameworks, which extend Dung's argumentation frameworks by handling two independent kinds of interaction between arguments, attack and support. In this bipolar context, we propose new semantics for coping with the problem of controversial arguments (arguments which indirectly attack and indirectly defend a same argument).