ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
Artificial Intelligence
A constrained argumentation system for practical reasoning
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 1
Computable Models of the Law
Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Prudent Preferred Semantics of Argumentation
ECSQARU '07 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
A Constrained Argumentation System for Practical Reasoning
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systems
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Semantics for Evidence-Based Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
On the Acceptability of Meta-arguments
WI-IAT '09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02
A persuasion dialog for gaining access to information
ArgMAS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems
Support in Abstract Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Moving Between Argumentation Frameworks
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
Argumentation frameworks with necessities
SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Inference from controversial arguments
LPAR'05 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning
A three-layer argumentation framework
TAFA'11 Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation
Agent-based ontology alignment: basics, applications, theoretical foundations, and demonstration
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
Relating the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks and standard AFs
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two
Open texture and argumentation: what makes an argument persuasive?
Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Generalizing naive and stable semantics in argumentation frameworks with necessities and preferences
SUM'12 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management
Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Can AI Models Capture Natural Language Argumentation?
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence
Can AI Models Capture Natural Language Argumentation?
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we extend the basic abstract argumentation framework proposed by Dung, by taking into account two independent kinds of interaction between arguments: a defeat relation and a support relation. In that new framework, called a bipolar argumentation framework, we focus on the concept of acceptability and propose new semantics defined from characteristic properties that a set of arguments must satisfy in order to be an output of the argumentation process. We generalize the well-known stable and preferred semantics by enforcing the coherence requirement for an acceptable set of arguments.