Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
Journal of Logic and Computation
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Elements of Argumentation
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
Bridging the Gap between Abstract Argumentation Systems and Logic
SUM '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management
Handling enthymemes in time-limited persuasion dialogs
SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
On the meta-logic of arguments
ArgMAS'05 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks
ECSQARU'05 Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Journal of Logic and Computation
A Relevance-theoretic Framework for Constructing and Deconstructing Enthymemes
Journal of Logic and Computation
Review: an introduction to argumentation semantics
The Knowledge Engineering Review
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Formal AI models of argumentation define arguments as reasons that support claims which may be beliefs, decisions, actions, etc.. Such arguments may be attacked by other arguments. The main issue is then to identify the accepted ones. Several semantics were thus proposed for evaluating the arguments. Works in linguistics focus mainly on understanding the notion of argument, identifying its types, and describing different forms of counter-argumentation. This paper advocates that such typologies are instrumental for capturing real argumentations. It shows that some of the forms cannot be handled properly by AI models. Finally, it shows that the use of square of oppositions a very old logical device illuminates the interrelations between the different forms of argumentation.