The Pleadings Game: an exercise in computational dialectics
Artificial Intelligence and Law
A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
Artificial Intelligence
Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous Agents
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
Modeling Dialogues Using Argumentation
ICMAS '00 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-2000)
Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency
Artificial Intelligence
Using enthymemes in an inquiry dialogue system
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 1
Towards ACL semantics based on commitments and penalties
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on ECAI 2006: 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence August 29 -- September 1, 2006, Riva del Garda, Italy
Real arguments are approximate arguments
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
A Logical Framework for Grounding-based Dialogue Analysis
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS)
A Dynamic Argumentation Framework
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
A First Attempt to Allow Enthymemes in Persuasion Dialogs
DEXA '11 Proceedings of the 2011 22nd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications
DebateWEL: an interface for debating with enthymemes and logical formulas
JELIA'12 Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Can AI Models Capture Natural Language Argumentation?
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence
Can AI Models Capture Natural Language Argumentation?
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence
Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper is a first attempt to define a framework to handle enthymeme in a time-limited persuasion dialog. The notion of incomplete argument is explicited and a protocol is proposed to regulate the utterances of a persuasion dialog with respect to the three criteria of consistency, nonredundancy and listening. This protocol allows the use of enthymemes concerning the support or conclusion of the argument, enables the agent to retract or re-specify an argument. The system is illustrated on a small example and some of its properties are outlined.