A translation approach to portable ontology specifications
Knowledge Acquisition - Special issue: Current issues in knowledge modeling
Towards an argument interchange format
The Knowledge Engineering Review
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Artificial Intelligence
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Artificial Intelligence
On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
International Journal of Intelligent Systems - Bipolar Representations of Information and Preference Part 2: Reasoning and Learning
Arguments in OWL: A Progress Report
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems
An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems
Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks
ECSQARU'05 Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks
ECSQARU'05 Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Review: representing and classifying arguments on the semantic web
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Social Networked Multi-agent Negotiation in Ontology Alignment
WI-IAT '12 Proceedings of the The 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02
Improved Relaxation-based Ontology Matching Negotiation
Proceedings of International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Argumentation frameworks which are abstract are suitable for the study of independent properties of any specific aspect (e.g. arguments sceptical and credulous admissible) that are relevant for any argumentation context. However, its direct adoption on specific application contexts requires dealing with questions such as the argument structure, the argument categories, the conditions under which an attack/support is established between arguments, etc. This paper presents a generic argumentation framework which comprehends a conceptualization layer to capture the expressivity and semantics of the argumentation data employed in a specific context and simplifies its adoption by applications. The conceptualization layer together with the defined argument structure is exploited to automatically derive the attack and support relationships between arguments.