A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Scenario semantics of extended logic programs
Proceedings of the second international workshop on Logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning
Abstract argumentation systems
Artificial Intelligence
An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
The Zeno argumentation framework
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
Artificial Intelligence
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols
Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Journal of Automated Reasoning
An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases
JELIA '02 Proceedings of the European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Using arguments for making decisions: a possibilistic logic approach
UAI '04 Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Towards a formal framework for the search of a consensus between autonomous agents
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
Journal of Logic and Computation
SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
Artificial Intelligence
Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
A generative inquiry dialogue system
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation
AAAI'06 Proceedings of the 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Practical first-order argumentation
AAAI'05 Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Arguing for decisions: a qualitative model of decision making
UAI'96 Proceedings of the Twelfth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Dialectic resoning with inconsistent information
UAI'93 Proceedings of the Ninth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases
UAI'93 Proceedings of the Ninth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation
JELIA'06 Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation-Supported information distribution in a multiagent system for knowledge management
ArgMAS'05 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases: the prioritized case
ECSQARU'05 Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation-Based Inference and Decision Making--A Medical Perspective
IEEE Intelligent Systems
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Coordination and Agreement in Multi-Agent Systems
CIA '08 Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on Cooperative Information Agents XII
Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems: Towards a Technology of Agreement
MATES '08 Proceedings of the 6th German conference on Multiagent System Technologies
A Level-based Approach to Computing Warranted Arguments in Possibilistic Defeasible Programming
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Resolution-Based Argumentation Semantics
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
A Systematic Classification of Argumentation Frameworks where Semantics Agree
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
On the Issue of Contraposition of Defeasible Rules
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
On the Relationship of Defeasible Argumentation and Answer Set Programming
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Bridging the Gap between Abstract Argumentation Systems and Logic
SUM '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management
ANGLE: An autonomous, normative and guidable agent with changing knowledge
Information Sciences: an International Journal
A characterization of collective conflict for defeasible argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Generalizing stable semantics by preferences
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Some design guidelines for practical argumentation systems
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Reasoning about Preferences in Structured Extended Argumentation Frameworks
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Modal and temporal argumentation networks
Time for verification
A formal analysis of logic-based argumentation systems
SUM'10 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
Artificial Intelligence
A computational method for defeasible argumentation based on a recursive warrant semantics
IBERAMIA'10 Proceedings of the 12th Ibero-American conference on Advances in artificial intelligence
Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and properties
Artificial Intelligence
Closure and consistency rationalities in logic-based argumentation
Logic programming, knowledge representation, and nonmonotonic reasoning
Strong equivalence for argumentation semantics based on conflict-free sets
ECSQARU'11 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty
Backing and undercutting in defeasible logic programming
ECSQARU'11 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty
Knowledge and reasoning for question answering: Research perspectives
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues
The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
Maximal ideal recursive semantics for defeasible argumentation
SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
t-DeLP: a temporal extension of the defeasible logic programming argumentative framework
SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
On the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Review: an introduction to argumentation semantics
The Knowledge Engineering Review
A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Approaches to text mining arguments from legal cases
Semantic Processing of Legal Texts
Preference-Based argumentation handling dynamic preferences built on prioritized logic programming
PRIMA'11 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Agents in Principle, Agents in Practice
Arguing about preferences and decisions
ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
A three-layer argumentation framework
TAFA'11 Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation
Revisiting preferences and argumentation
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two
Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation
Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Quantifying disagreement in argument-based reasoning
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
Artificial Intelligence
Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Extending a temporal defeasible argumentation framework with possibilistic weights
JELIA'12 Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators
JELIA'12 Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Stable semantics in logic-based argumentation
SUM'12 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management
Dimensions of argumentation in social media
EKAW'12 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management
Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues
ArgMAS'11 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
A general account of argumentation with preferences
Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation-logic for creating and explaining medical hypotheses
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
ECSQARU'13 Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
Artificial Intelligence
Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
t-DeLP: an argumentation-based Temporal Defeasible Logic Programming framework
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Organisational structures in next-generation distributed systems: Towards a technology of agreement
Multiagent and Grid Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Argumentation theory has become an important topic in the field of AI. The basic idea is to construct arguments in favor and against a statement, to select the ''acceptable'' ones and, finally, to determine whether the original statement can be accepted or not. Several argumentation systems have been proposed in the literature. Some of them, the so-called rule-based systems, use a particular logical language with strict and defeasible rules. While these systems are useful in different domains (e.g. legal reasoning), they unfortunately lead to very unintuitive results, as is discussed in this paper. In order to avoid such anomalies, in this paper we are interested in defining principles, called rationality postulates, that can be used to judge the quality of a rule-based argumentation system. In particular, we define two important rationality postulates that should be satisfied: the consistency and the closure of the results returned by that system. We then provide a relatively easy way in which these rationality postulates can be warranted for a particular rule-based argumentation system developed within a European project on argumentation.