A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework

Authors:
Floris Bex;Henry Prakken;Chris Reed
Affiliations:
Argumentation Research Group, School of Computing, University of Dundee;Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University/ Faculty of Law, University of Groningen;Argumentation Research Group, School of Computing, University of Dundee
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Year:
2010

Citing 10
Cited 1

Justification and defeat

Artificial Intelligence
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Abstract argumentation systems

Artificial Intelligence
An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning

Artificial Intelligence
Towards an argument interchange format

The Knowledge Engineering Review
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms

Artificial Intelligence
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web

Artificial Intelligence
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks

Artificial Intelligence
AIF+: Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Format

Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Review: representing and classifying arguments on the semantic web

The Knowledge Engineering Review

Semantic information and knowledge integration through argumentative reasoning to support intelligent decision making

Information Systems Frontiers

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In order to support the interchange of ideas and data between different projects and applications in the area of computational argumentation, a common ontology for computational argument, the Argument Interchange Format (AIF), has been devised. One of the criticisms levelled at the AIF has been that it does not take into account formal argumentation systems and their associated argumentation-theoretic semantics, which are part of the main focus of the field of computational argumentation. This paper aims to meet those criticisms by analysing the core AIF ontology in terms of the recently developed ASPIC argumentation framework.