Arguments in OWL: A Progress Report

  • Authors:
  • Iyad Rahwan;Bita Banihashemi

  • Affiliations:
  • Faculty of Informatics, The British University in Dubai, Dubai, UAE and School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, UK;Faculty of Informatics, The British University in Dubai, Dubai, UAE

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In previous work, we presented an RDFS ontology, based on the Argument Interchange Format (AIF), for describing arguments and argument schemes. We also implemented a pilot Web-based system, called ArgDF, for authoring and querying argument structures represented in RDF. In this paper, we discuss some of the limitations of our earlier reification of the AIF. We then present a new ontology which takes advantage of the higher expressive power of OWL. We demonstrate how this enables the use of automated Description Logic reasoning over argument structures. In particular, OWL reasoning enables significantly enhanced querying of arguments through automatic scheme classifications, instance classification, and inference of indirect support in chained argument structures.