Artificial Intelligence
An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning
An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning
Readings in nonmonotonic reasoning
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
Artificial Intelligence
Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (vol. 3)
An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
The Hearsay-II Speech-Understanding System: Integrating Knowledge to Resolve Uncertainty
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice
Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic
WWW '03 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web
The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications
The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
Journal of Logic and Computation
Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Artificial Intelligence
Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference
Arguments in OWL: A Progress Report
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argumentation with Value JudgmentsAn Example of Hypothetical Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Analyzing open source license compatibility issues with Carneades
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argumentation-logic for explaining anomalous patient responses to treatments
AIME'11 Proceedings of the 13th conference on Artificial intelligence in medicine
Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
The process of reaching agreement in meaning negotiation
Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence VII
Ontology framework for judgment modelling
AICOL'11 Proceedings of the 25th IVR Congress conference on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems: models and ethical challenges for legal systems, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation and software agents
Argumentation-logic for creating and explaining medical hypotheses
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Introducing the Carneades web application
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Legal reasoning typically requires a variety of argumentation schemes to be used together. A legal case may raise issues requiring argument from precedent cases, rules, policy goals, moral principles, jurisprudential doctrine, social values and evidence. We present an extensible software architecture which allows diverse computational models of argumentation schemes to be used together in an integrated way to construct and search for arguments. The architecture has been implemented in Carneades, a software library for building argumentation tools. The architecture is illustrated with models of schemes for argument from ontologies, rules, cases and testimonial evidence and compared to blackboard systems for hybrid reasoning.