Generating legal arguments and predictions from case texts
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
MetaLex XML and the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format
Computable Models of the Law
Constructing Legal Arguments with Rules in the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF)
Computable Models of the Law
Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Rules and Norms: Requirements for Rule Interchange Languages in the Legal Domain
RuleML '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications
Fill the Gap in the Legal Knowledge Modelling
RuleML '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications
Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Multi-layer markup and ontological structures in Akoma Ntoso
AICOL-I/IVR-XXIV'09 Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems: complex systems, the semantic web, ontologies, argumentation, and dialogue
Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The paper shows how to model judgments starting from the text and capturing not only the structural parts, but also the basic arguments used by the judge to reach its conclusions. We have also included a qualification of citations following the Shepard's method. The goal of this approach is to build a complete ontology framework capable of detecting and modelling knowledge directly from the judgment's text, providing the basic metadata to the logic and reasoning layers.