Moving in the Time: An Ontology for Identifying Legal Resources
Computable Models of the Law
Constructing Legal Arguments with Rules in the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF)
Computable Models of the Law
Content Ontology Design Patterns as Practical Building Blocks for Web Ontologies
ER '08 Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling
Rules and Norms: Requirements for Rule Interchange Languages in the Legal Domain
RuleML '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications
Fill the Gap in the Legal Knowledge Modelling
RuleML '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems
Ontology framework for judgment modelling
AICOL'11 Proceedings of the 25th IVR Congress conference on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems: models and ethical challenges for legal systems, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation and software agents
Introduction to the universal delta model
Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on Document engineering
Recognising document components in XML-based academic articles
Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on Document engineering
A well-founded ontological framework for modeling personal income tax
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Integration of legal datasets: from meta-model to implementation
Proceedings of International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The XML documents that represent legal resources contain information and legal knowledge that belong to many distinct conceptual layers. This paper shows how the Akoma Ntoso standard keeps these layers well separated while providing ontological structures on top of them. Additionally, this paper illustrates how Akoma Ntoso allows multiple interpretations, provided by different agents, over the same set of texts and concepts and how current semantic technologies can use these interpretations to reason on the underlying legal texts.