Accommodating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
Systems to support cooperative work: computational dialectics
Computers as assistants
Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation
Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation
Introduction to Human Factors Engineering (2nd Edition)
Introduction to Human Factors Engineering (2nd Edition)
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Artificial Intelligence
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially the structure as it can be represented in boxes-and-arrows style diagrams. In this paper an alternative way of providing argumentation support is proposed. A content-oriented, relatively lowtech tool is presented, based on the knowledge structure of a legal topic, inspired by the structure of legal treatises. The design for this system builds on research in the areas of law, logic, argumentation theory and cognitive ergonomics. A small user evaluation has been performed to examine the usefulness of the system. We show that supporting legal reasoning based on the knowledge structure of a legal topic can be an interesting foundation for argumentation software.