Representing the structure of a legal argument
ICAIL '89 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
CABARET: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
Artificial Intelligence
Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming
Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming
Abstract argumentation systems
Artificial Intelligence
An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
The Zeno argumentation framework
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Automated argument assistance for lawyers
ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Theory based explanation of case law domains: 38
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A simple model to structure the information of parties in online ADR
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice
Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
Artificial Intelligence
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
A mathematical model for argument procedures based on Indian philosophy
AIA'06 Proceedings of the 24th IASTED international conference on Artificial intelligence and applications
Legitimacy and the virtualization of dispute resolution
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Online dispute resolution
Argument-based critics and recommenders: a qualitative perspective on user support systems
Data & Knowledge Engineering - Special issue: WIDM 2004
AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web
Artificial Intelligence
ITS '08 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Applying Web 2.0 Design Principles in the Design of Cooperative Applications
CDVE '08 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering
AVER: Argument Visualization for Evidential Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference
A Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
Study on the Structure of Argumentation in Case Law
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systems
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Beyond boxes and arrows: argumentation support in terms of the knowledge structure of a legal topic
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference
Recommender System Technologies based on Argumentation 1
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering: Real Word AI Systems with Applications in eHealth, HCI, Information Retrieval and Pervasive Technologies
Towards large scale argumentation support on the semantic web
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
A labeling approach to the computation of credulous acceptance in argumentation
IJCAI'07 Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence
SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
Artificial Intelligence
Assessing Argument Diagrams in an Ill-defined Domain
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling
Assisting students with argumentation plans when solving problems in CSCL
Computers & Education
Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argumentation and rules with exceptions
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
System for supporting web-based public debate using transcripts of face-to-face meeting
IEA/AIE'10 Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Industrial engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems - Volume Part III
Modeling authority commitments in two search and seizure cases
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Towards argument representational tools for hybrid argumentation systems
HCII'11 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Human interface and the management of information: interacting with information - Volume Part II
Argumentation-Supported information distribution in a multiagent system for knowledge management
ArgMAS'05 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Institutional pragmatics and legal ontology limits of the descriptive approach of texts
Law and the Semantic Web
Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques
ITS'06 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume One
Supporting incremental formalization in collaborative learning environments
EC-TEL'07 Proceedings of the Second European conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: creating new learning experiences on a global scale
Context-Aware Multi-Agent Planning in intelligent environments
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Argumentation-Based Learning for Communities of Practice
International Journal of Knowledge Society Research
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automated reasoning tools, the objective is not to replace reasoning, but to guide the user's production of arguments. Two systems are presented, ARGUE! and ARGUMED based on DEFLOG. The focus is on defeasible argumentation with an eye on the law. Argument assistants for defeasible argumentation naturally correspond to a view of the application of law as dialectical theory construction. The experiments provide insights into the design of argument assistants, and show the pros and cons of different ways of representing argumentative data. The development of the argumentation theories underlying the systems has culminated in the logical system DEFLOG that formalizes the interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions. DEFLOG introduces an innovative use of conditionals expressing support and attack. This allows the expression of warrants for support and attack, making it a transparent and flexible system of defeasible argumentation.