Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques

  • Authors:

  • Niels Pinkwart;Vincent Aleven;Kevin Ashley;Collin Lynch

  • Affiliations:

  • HCI Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA;HCI Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA;School of Law, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA;Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Venue:
  • ITS'06 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper presents an approach for intelligent tutoring in the field of legal argumentation. In this approach, students study transcripts of US Supreme Court oral argument and create a graphical representation of argument flow as tests offered by attorneys being challenged by hypotheticals posed by Justices. The proposed system, which is based on the collaborative modeling framework Cool Modes, is capable of detecting three types of weaknesses in arguments; when it does, it presents the student with a self explanation prompt. This kind of feedback seems more appropriate than the “strong connective feedback” typically offered by model-tracing or constraint-based tutors. Structural and context weaknesses in arguments are handled by graph grammars, and the critical problem of detecting and dealing with content weaknesses in student contributions is addressed through a collaborative filtering approach, thereby avoiding the critical problem of natural language processing in legal argumentation. An early version of the system was pilot tested with two students.