Dimension-based analysis of hypotheticals from supreme court oral argument

Authors:
E. L. Rissland
Affiliations:
Department of Computer & Information Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Venue:
ICAIL '89 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Year:
1989

Citing 4
Cited 23

A case-based system for trade secrets law

ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Ashley,K. D.-But, see, accord: generating blue book citations in HYPO

ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Modelling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals

Modelling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals
A Case-Based Approach to Modeling Legal Expertise

IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications

Separating world and regulation knowledge: where is the logic

ICAIL '91 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Similarity in harder cases: sentencing for fraud

ICAIL '93 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Detecting change in legal concepts

ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
I yield one minute…: an analysis of the final speeches from the House impeachment hearings

ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument models

ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Law, learning and representation

Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: a computational model and an intelligent learning environment

Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Helping law students to understand US Supreme Court oral arguments: a planned experiment

ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Legal information retrieval and application to e-rulemaking

ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments

Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals

Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning

Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference
Black Swans, Gray Cygnets and Other Rare Birds

ICCBR '09 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development
Toward Modeling and Teaching Legal Case-Based Adaptation with Expert Examples

ICCBR '09 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development
A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases

Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2009: The Twenty-Second Annual Conference
Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals

Artificial Intelligence and Law
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law

Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argumentation with Value JudgmentsAn Example of Hypothetical Reasoning

Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Catching Gray Cygnets: an initial exploration

Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts

Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques

ITS'06 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Open texture and argumentation: what makes an argument persuasive?

Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values

Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we examine a sequence of hypotheticals taken from a Supreme Court oral argument. We use the idea of a “dimension,” developed previously in our case-based reasoning system HYPO, to analyze the hypotheticals and to speculate on how the Justices might have arrived at them. The case we consider is taken from the area of Fourth Amendment law concerning warrantless search and seizure.