Dimension-based analysis of hypotheticals from supreme court oral argument
ICAIL '89 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
CABARET: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
Modeling Legal Argument Reasoning With Cases and Hypotheticals
Modeling Legal Argument Reasoning With Cases and Hypotheticals
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
AGATHA: automated construction of case law theories through heuristic search
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Dialogues about the burden of proof
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
Journal of Logic and Computation
Argumentation and standards of proof
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
An ontology in OWL for legal case-based reasoning
Artificial Intelligence and Law
About the logical relations between cases and rules
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
Pierson vs. Post RevisitedA Reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation Framework
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2009: The Twenty-Second Annual Conference
PADUA: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law
Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Balancing of Legal Principles and Constraint Satisfaction
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Argumentation with Value JudgmentsAn Example of Hypothetical Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Modelling of a'fortiori reasoning
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Open texture and argumentation: what makes an argument persuasive?
Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Balancing rights and values in the italian courts: a benchmark for a quantitative analysis
AICOL'11 Proceedings of the 25th IVR Congress conference on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems: models and ethical challenges for legal systems, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation and software agents
Using event progression to enhance purposive argumentation in the value judgment formalism
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modeling teleological interpretation
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Factor-based parent plan support system
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper explains and illustrates in an example context how case comparison in legal case-based reasoning can be modeled in the value judgment formalism. It presents a set of argument schemes corresponding to typical moves in case-based reasoning which make use of intermediate legal concepts and their impact on the applicable values.