Artificial Intelligence - Special volume on qualitative reasoning about physical systems
An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning
An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning
CABARET: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
The well-founded semantics for general logic programs
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link
ICAIL '93 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
The use of meta-rules in rule based legal computer systems
ICAIL '93 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Artificial intelligence: theory and practice
Artificial intelligence: theory and practice
An implementation of Eisner v. Macomber
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Theory based explanation of case law domains: 38
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
A Case-Based Approach to Modeling Legal Expertise
IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Developing legal knowledge based systems through theory construction
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
Arguing about cases as practical reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
AGATHA: automated construction of case law theories through heuristic search
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Helping law students to understand US Supreme Court oral arguments: a planned experiment
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Additive consolidation for dialogue game
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argumentation in AI and law: editors' introduction
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
AGATHA: using heuristic search to automate the construction of case law theories
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argumentation and standards of proof
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Formal models of coherence and legal epistemology
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Introduction to special issue on modelling legal cases
Artificial Intelligence and Law
An ontology in OWL for legal case-based reasoning
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Theory and Practice in AI and Law: A Response to Branting
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2005: The Eighteenth Annual Conference
A Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
About the logical relations between cases and rules
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
Modular Argumentation For Modelling Legal Doctrines in Common Law of Contract
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
Legal Theory, Sources of Law and the Semantic Web
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Legal Theory, Sources of Law and the Semantic Web
Pierson vs. Post RevisitedA Reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation Framework
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference
Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Case law in extended argumentation frameworks
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2009: The Twenty-Second Annual Conference
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines in common law of contract
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Dialogue game tree with nondeterministic additive consolidation
CLIMA VII'06 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems
Strategic argumentation in open multi-agent societies
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Doing justice to rights and values: teleological reasoning and proportionality
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Balancing of Legal Principles and Constraint Satisfaction
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Argumentation with Value JudgmentsAn Example of Hypothetical Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Analogy, similarity and factors
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Determining preferences through argumentation
AI*IA'05 Proceedings of the 9th conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
On a computational argumentation framework for agent societies
ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
PISA: A framework for multiagent classification using argumentation
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Open texture and argumentation: what makes an argument persuasive?
Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Argue to agree: A case-based argumentation approach
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Case-based strategies for argumentation dialogues in agent societies
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Balancing rights and values in the italian courts: a benchmark for a quantitative analysis
AICOL'11 Proceedings of the 25th IVR Congress conference on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems: models and ethical challenges for legal systems, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation and software agents
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Using event progression to enhance purposive argumentation in the value judgment formalism
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modeling teleological interpretation
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
ArgCBROnto: a knowledge representation formalism for case-based argumentation
AT'13 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Agreement Technologies
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Reasoning with cases has been a primary focus of those working in AI and law who have attempted to model legal reasoning. In this paper we put forward a formal model of reasoning with cases which captures many of the insights from that previous work. We begin by stating our view of reasoning with cases as a process of constructing, evaluating and applying a theory. Central to our model is a view of the relationship between cases, rules based on cases, and the social values which justify those rules. Having given our view of these relationships, we present our formal model of them, and explain how theories can be constructed, compared and evaluated. We then show how previous work can be described in terms of our model, and discuss extensions to the basic model to accommodate particular features of previous work. We conclude by identifying some directions for future work.