An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning
An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning
Conceptual organization of case law knowledge bases
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A case-based system for trade secrets law
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Precedent-based legal reasoning and knowledge acquisition in contract law: A process model
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Representing and reusing explanations of legal precedents
ICAIL '89 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Creativity and learning in a case-based explainer
Machine learning: paradigms and methods
CABARET: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
ICAIL '91 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Toward an intelligent tutoring system for teaching law students to argue with cases
ICAIL '91 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Reasoning with portions of precedents
ICAIL '91 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Context sensitive case comparisons in practical ethics: reasoning about reasons
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Evaluating a learning environment for case-based argumentation skills
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Legal merit arguments, legal semiotics and the design of legal knowledge-based systems
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Theory based explanation of case law domains: 38
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Law, learning and representation
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
A reduction-graph model of precedent in legal analysis
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Try to see it my way: modelling persuasion in legal discourse
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Arguing about cases as practical reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Additive consolidation for dialogue game
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argumentation in AI and law: editors' introduction
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application
Artificial Intelligence and Law
On formalisation of the goal concept in law
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation and standards of proof
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Transparent Complexity by Goals
EGOV '08 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic Government
Introduction to special issue on modelling legal cases
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Theory and Practice in AI and Law: A Response to Branting
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2005: The Eighteenth Annual Conference
Zeno Revisited: Representation of Persuasive Argument
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference
Pierson vs. Post RevisitedA Reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation Framework
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Case law in extended argumentation frameworks
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines in common law of contract
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Dialogue game tree with nondeterministic additive consolidation
CLIMA VII'06 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems
Doing justice to rights and values: teleological reasoning and proportionality
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Analogy, similarity and factors
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Open texture and argumentation: what makes an argument persuasive?
Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Using event progression to enhance purposive argumentation in the value judgment formalism
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modeling teleological interpretation
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
We argue that robust case-based models of legal knowledge that represent the way in which practicing professionals use legal decisions must contain a deeper domain model that represents the purposes behind the rules articulated in the cases. We propose a model for representing the teleological components of legal decisions, and we suggest a method for utilizing this representation in a HYPO-like framework for case-based legal argument.