Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link
ICAIL '93 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Detecting change in legal concepts
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Theory based explanation of case law domains: 38
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency
Artificial Intelligence
Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Arguing about cases as practical reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Intelligent tools for managing factual arguments
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology - Marco Somalvico Memorial Issue
Theory and Practice in AI and Law: A Response to Branting
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2005: The Eighteenth Annual Conference
Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Case law in extended argumentation frameworks
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
System Personality and Persuasion in Human-Computer Dialogue
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS)
Using event progression to enhance purposive argumentation in the value judgment formalism
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper I argue that to explain and resolve some kinds of disagreement we need to go beyond what logic alone can provide. In particular, following Perelman, I argue that we need to consider how arguments are ascribed different strengths by different audiences, according to how accepting these arguments promotes values favoured by the audience to which they are addressed. I show how we can extend the standard framework for modelling argumentation systems to allow different audiences to be represented. I also show how this formalism can explain how some disputes can be resolved while in others the parties can only agree to differ. I illustrate this by consideration of a legal example. Finally, I make some suggestions as to where these values come from, and how they can be used to explain differences across jurisdictions, and changes in views over time.