Making way for intelligence in case space
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A model based reasoning approach for generating plausible crime scenarios from evidence
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
Try to see it my way: modelling persuasion in legal discourse
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argumentation structures in legal dossiers
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Intelligent tools for managing legal choices
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
By exploring some practical questions in the context of a supremely impractical debate, this article seeks to highlight the challenges and opportunities faced by those trying to promote better use of intelligent tools in the legal workplace. It lays out design features for an imagined online argument manager, describes knowledge engineering challenges such a system presents, and links these to recent research and scholarship. In addition to reviewing theoretical characteristics of factual argumentation, this article considers what kinds of tools are or could be available for everyday use by nonspecialists.