Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in HYPO
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
Hard cases: a procedural approach
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Some arguments about legal arguments
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Why non-monotonic logic is inadequate to represent balancing arguments
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
Try to see it my way: modelling persuasion in legal discourse
Artificial Intelligence and Law
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Evaluating cases in legal disputes as rival theories
JSAI-isAI'09 Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on New frontiers in artificial intelligence
Balancing of Legal Principles and Constraint Satisfaction
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Legal shifts in the process of proof
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modelling of a fortiori reasoning
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modelling of a'fortiori reasoning
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper briefly argues for a (particular variant of) a coherence theory of legal justification and theory construction. It does so by placing coherentism in a tradition of general epistemology and practical reasoning. One part of the theory, namely the part that deals with the relation between abstract goals and concrete regulations, is described in detail, and formalized.