Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
Artificial Intelligence
Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change
Artificial Intelligence
What does a conditional knowledge base entail?
Artificial Intelligence
Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link
ICAIL '93 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning
Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (vol. 3)
Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
Artificial Intelligence
Theory based explanation of case law domains: 38
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Refinement: a tool to deal with inconsistencies
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice
Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice
Making Beliefs Coherentl. The Subtraction and Addition Strategies.
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey
Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part II
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
AGATHA: automated construction of case law theories through heuristic search
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Additive consolidation for dialogue game
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A metalogic formalization of legal argumentation as game trees with defeasible reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Additive Consolidation with Maximal Change
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we will show that theory-based legal argumentation can be formalized as a dialogue game tree. In [37], a variation of Olsson's additive consolidation [29] is used for the formalization, but this dialogue game was not treed, because, in each move on the dialogue, the consolidation must construct a unique coherent theory, but not several coherent theories. Therefore, we abandon the requirement that rational consolidation must be unique, and we allow the consolidation to generate plural outputs. Such an operator will be applied for a dialogue game tree with Bench-Capon and Sartor's example.