Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argument Diagramming and Diagnostic Reliability
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2009: The Twenty-Second Annual Conference
On extracting arguments from Bayesian network representations of evidential reasoning
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Practical argumentation semantics for socially efficient defeasible consequence
The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
Practical argumentation semantics for pareto optimality and its relationships with values
ArgMAS'11 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Use of argumentation methods applied to legal reasoning is a relatively new field of study. Many vitally important problems of legal reasoning can be profitably studied in light of these new methods, even if they cannot all be solved in any single monograph. This book provides a survey of the leading problems, and outlines how future research using argumentation-based methods show great promise of leading to useful solutions. The problems studied include not only these of argument evaluation and argument invention, but also analysis of specific kinds of evidence commonly used in law, like witness testimony, circumstantial evidence, forensic evidence and character evidence. New tools for analyzing these kinds of evidence are introduced, like argument diagramming, abductive reasoning, an analysis of conditional relevance and a new dialectical model of explanation.