Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Multicriteria Optimization
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Online dispute resolution
Doing justice to rights and values: teleological reasoning and proportionality
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Concepts, Structures, and Goals: Redefining Ill-Definedness
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Argumentation with Value JudgmentsAn Example of Hypothetical Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference
Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Hi-index | 0.00 |
A factor-based approach to case-based reasoning has been successfully applied in the field of AI and Law to model legal arguments in adversarial judicial procedures. In this paper, we discuss how factors and dimensions can be applied in a dispute-support system that aims to reconcile inconsistent interests of the parties for the sake of a higher-order value, that is, the well being of a child.