Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
Artificial Intelligence
Learning through synchronous electronic discussion
Computers & Education - VIRTUALITY IN EDUCATION selected contributions from the CAL 99 symposium
A Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation
ATAL '97 Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents IV, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
Human-Computer Interface for Collaborative Argumentation
MSE '00 Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Argumentation-based negotiation
The Knowledge Engineering Review
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
A Human-Computer Dialogue System for Educational Debate: A Computational Dialectics Approach
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Developing argumentation processing agents for computer-supported collaborative learning
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Efficient solutions for Mastermind using genetic algorithms
Computers and Operations Research
An architecture for intelligent CSCL argumentation systems
CSCL'09 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 2
Building user argumentative models
Applied Intelligence
Architectures for negotiating agents
CEEMAS'03 Proceedings of the 3rd Central and Eastern European conference on Multi-agent systems
Analysing graphic-based electronic discussions: evaluation of students’ activity on digalo
EC-TEL'06 Proceedings of the First European conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: innovative Approaches for Learning and Knowledge Sharing
Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques
ITS'06 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In CSCL systems, students who are solving problems in group have to negotiate with each other by exchanging proposals and arguments in order to resolve the conflicts and generate a shared solution. In this context, argument construction assistance is necessary to facilitate reaching to a consensus. This assistance is usually provided with isolated arguments by demand, but this does not offer students a real and integral view of the conflicts. In this work, we study the utilisation of argumentation plans to assist a student during the argumentation. The actions of an argumentation plan represent the arguments that a student might use during the argumentation process. Moreover, these plans can be integrated with the tasks needed to reach a shared solution. These plans give the student an integral and intuitive view of the problem resolution and the conflict that must be resolved. We evaluated our proposal with students of an Artificial Intelligence course. This evaluation was carried out by comparing three different assistance scenarios in which students had to solve exercises: no assistance, assistance with isolated arguments, and assistance with argumentation plans. The results obtained show that reaching consensus was easier for the students when the assistance was provided using argumentations plans.