A Computational Model of Argumentation in Everyday Conversation: A Problem-Centred Approach

Authors:
Jean-Louis Dessalles
Affiliations:
Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault-75013 Paris-France, dessalles@enst.fr
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Year:
2008

Citing 5
Cited 1

A theory of diagnosis from first principles

Artificial Intelligence
The simulation of conversations

COGNITIVA 90 Proceedings of the third COGNITIVA symposium on At the crossroads of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and neuroscience
Interpretation as abduction

Artificial Intelligence - Special volume on natural language processing
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation and Persuasion in the Cognitive Coherence Theory

Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006

A platform for the evaluation of automated argumentation strategies

RSCTC'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Rough sets and current trends in computing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Human beings share a common competence for generating relevant arguments. We therefore hypothesize the existence of a cognitive procedure that enables them to determine the content of their arguments. The originality of the present approach is to analyse spontaneous argument generation as a process in which arguments either signal problems or aim at solving previously acknowledged problems.