A platform for the evaluation of automated argumentation strategies

Authors:
Piotr S. Kośmicki
Affiliations:
Institute of Computer Science, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
Venue:
RSCTC'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Rough sets and current trends in computing
Year:
2010

Citing 5
Cited 0

On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation

Journal of Logic and Computation
Towards an argument interchange format

The Knowledge Engineering Review
The Carneades Argumentation FrameworkUsing Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions

Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
A Computational Model of Argumentation in Everyday Conversation: A Problem-Centred Approach

Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper describes a platform for testing automated argumentation strategies for agents. It is a continuation of the discussion about the Arguing Agents Competition (AAC). The second version of the AAC platform is introduced, including the architecture and the capabilities of the platform, the currently available engine and an automated strategy for the dialogue game. The argumentation and some of the formalizations for the arguments and dialogues are briefly presented.