Quantum lower bounds by polynomials
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey
Theoretical Computer Science - Complexity and logic
String Matching Algorithms and Automata
Proceedings of the Colloquium in Honor of Arto Salomaa on Results and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science
Average-Case Quantum Query Complexity
STACS '00 Proceedings of the 17th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments
Journal of Computer and System Sciences - Special issue on STOC 2000
1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations
FOCS '98 Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Bounds for Small-Error and Zero-Error Quantum Algorithms
FOCS '99 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Polynomial Degree vs. Quantum Query Complexity
FOCS '03 Proceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Superiority of exact quantum automata for promise problems
Information Processing Letters
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper studies quantum query complexities for deciding (exactly or with probability 1.0) the parity of permutations of n numbers, 0 through n *** 1. Our results show quantum mechanism is quite strong for this non-Boolean problem as it is for several Boolean problems: (i) For n = 3, we need a single query in the quantum case whereas we obviously need two queries deterministically. (ii) For even n , n /2 quantum queries are sufficient whereas we need n *** 1 queries deterministically. (iii) Our third result is for the problem deciding whether the given permutation is the identical one. For this problem, we show that there is a nontrivial promise such that if we impose that promise to the input of size n = 4m , then we need only two quantum queries, while at least 2m + 2 ( = n /2 + 2) deterministic queries are necessary.