Clearance Pricing and Inventory Policies for Retail Chains
Management Science
Intertemporal Pricing with Strategic Customer Behavior
Management Science
Online Auction and List Price Revenue Management
Management Science
Strategic Capacity Rationing to Induce Early Purchases
Management Science
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Optimal Pricing of Seasonal Products in the Presence of Forward-Looking Consumers
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Dynamic Pricing Strategies with Reference Effects
Operations Research
Optimal Pricing with Speculators and Strategic Consumers
Management Science
Intertemporal Pricing and Consumer Stockpiling
Operations Research
Selling with Binding Reservations in the Presence of Strategic Consumers
Management Science
Markdown Pricing with Unknown Fraction of Strategic Customers
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
The Value of Product Variety When Selling to Strategic Consumers
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Hi-index | 0.01 |
We propose a game-theoretical model of a retailer who sells a limited inventory of a product over a finite selling season by using one of two inventory display formats: display all (DA) and display one (DO). Under DA, the retailer displays all available units so that each arriving customer has perfect information about the actual inventory level. Under DO, the retailer displays only one unit at a time so that each customer knows about product availability but not the actual inventory level. Recent research suggests that when faced with strategic consumers, the retailer could increase expected profits by making an upfront commitment to a price path. We focus on such pricing strategies in this paper, and study the potential benefit of DO compared to DA, and its effectiveness in mitigating the adverse impact of strategic consumer behavior. We find support for our hypothesis that the DO format could potentially create an increased sense of shortage risk, and hence it is better than the DA format. However, although potentially beneficial, a move from DA to DO is typically very far from eliminating the adverse impact of strategic consumer behavior. We observe that, generally, it is not important for a retailer to modify the level of inventory when moving from a DA to a DO format; a change in the display format, along with an appropriate price modification, is typically sufficient. Interestingly, across all scenarios in which a change in inventory is significantly beneficial, we observed that only one of the following two actions takes place: either the premium price is increased along with a reduction in inventory, or inventory is increased along with premium price reduction. We find that the marginal benefit of DO can vary dramatically as a function of the per-unit cost to the retailer. In particular, when the retailer's per-unit cost is relatively high, but not too high to make sales unprofitable or to justify exclusive sales to high-valuation customers only, the benefits of DO appear to be at their highest level, and could reach up to 20% increase in profit. Finally, we demonstrate that by moving from DA to DO, while keeping the price path unchanged, the volatility of the retailer's profit decreases.