Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing
Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing
Building a large annotated corpus of English: the penn treebank
Computational Linguistics - Special issue on using large corpora: II
A maximum-entropy-inspired parser
NAACL 2000 Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference
A parsing: fast exact Viterbi parse selection
NAACL '03 Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1
Learning non-isomorphic tree mappings for machine translation
ACL '03 Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 2
Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking
ACL '05 Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
The importance of supertagging for wide-coverage CCG parsing
COLING '04 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics
Hierarchical Phrase-Based Translation
Computational Linguistics
CCGbank: A Corpus of CCG Derivations and Dependency Structures Extracted from the Penn Treebank
Computational Linguistics
A log-linear model with an n-gram reference distribution for accurate HPSG parsing
IWPT '07 Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parsing Technologies
Ambiguous part-of-speech tagging for improving accuracy and domain portability of syntactic parsers
IJCAI'07 Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence
Parsing '05 Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Parsing Technology
IJCNLP'04 Proceedings of the First international joint conference on Natural Language Processing
Comparing the accuracy of CCG and Penn Treebank parsers
ACLShort '09 Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers
Robust conversion of CCG derivations to phrase structure trees
ACL '12 Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers - Volume 2
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents a methodology for the comparative performance analysis of the parsers developed for different grammar frameworks. For such a comparison, we need a common representation format of the parsing results since the representation of the parsing results depends on the grammar frameworks; hence they are not directly comparable to each other. We first convert the parsing result to a shallow CFG analysis by using an automatic tree converter based on synchronous grammars. The use of such a shallow representation as a common format has the advantage of reduced noise introduced by the conversion in comparison with the noise produced by the conversion to deeper representations. We compared an HPSG parser with several CFG parsers in our experiment and found that meaningful differences among the parsers' performance can still be observed by such a shallow representation.