Intuitive moderation styles and beliefs of teachers in CSCL-based argumentation

Authors:
Julia Gil;Baruch B. Schwarz;Christa S. C. Asterhan
Affiliations:
The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel;The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel;The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Venue:
CSCL'07 Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning
Year:
2007

Citing 3
Cited 5

The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools

CSCL '05 Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years!
Collaborative technology for facilitating progressive inquiry: future learning environment tools

CSCL '99 Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning
Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups

CSCL '97 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning

Inter-and intra-subjective planes of e-argumentation: motivation, self-perception, expectations, and actual interlocutory behavior

ICLS'08 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 3
Analyzing and presenting interaction data: a teacher, student and researcher perspective

ICLS'08 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 3
Human guidance of synchronous E-discussions: the effects of different moderation scripts on peer argumentation

CSCL'09 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 1
Supporting Collaborative Learning and E-Discussions Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Teacher interventions in a synchronous, co-located CSCL setting: Analyzing focus, means, and temporality

Computers in Human Behavior

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

CSCL learning environments provide new contexts for discussions and are thought to provide new opportunities for learning. At the same time, such environments often do not provide guidance on how to act during the discussion. The purpose of this paper is to initiate research on moderation in synchronous discussions in a CSCL environment. The first study contrasts teachers' beliefs on good discussions and good moderation pertaining to face-to-face discussions with those pertaining to synchronous, CSCL-mediated discussions. The second study focuses on the strategies teachers intuitively enact in synchronous discussions.