Inter-and intra-subjective planes of e-argumentation: motivation, self-perception, expectations, and actual interlocutory behavior

Authors:
Baruch B. Schwarz;Christa S. C. Asterhan;Armin Weinberger;Karsten Stegmann;Frank Fischer;Astrid Wichmann;Andreas Harrer;H. Ulrich Hoppe
Affiliations:
School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel;School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel;Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Psychology, Germany;Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Psychology, Germany;Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Psychology, Germany;Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany;Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany;Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
Venue:
ICLS'08 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 3
Year:
2008

Citing 4
Cited 0

Human support in CSCL: what, for whom, and by whom?

What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education
The equalization phenomenon: status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups

Human-Computer Interaction
Computer supported moderation of e-discussions: the ARGUNAUT approach

CSCL'07 Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning
Intuitive moderation styles and beliefs of teachers in CSCL-based argumentation

CSCL'07 Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Research on learning and argumentation traditionally focuses on the (socio-) cognitive dimensions and benefits of argumentative dialogue. The papers which are part of this symposium, however, present recent research on intra-personal, non-cognitive variables and how they affect or are affected by electronic collective argumentation. The data are obtained from both e-discussants as well as e-moderators and pertain to factors such as motivation, self-perception, role definitions and expectations. The three contributions provide information on these factors before, during and after e-discussions and help delving in the dynamics of (moderated) e-argumentation.