ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Model-Based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications
Model-Based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Reasoning about inconsistencies in natural language requirements
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
ICLS '04 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences
Argument-based critics and recommenders: a qualitative perspective on user support systems
Data & Knowledge Engineering - Special issue: WIDM 2004
Knowledge and information distribution leveraged by intelligent agents
Knowledge and Information Systems
Clear justification of modeling decisions for goal-oriented requirements engineering
Requirements Engineering
User interface analysis for groupware applications in the TOUCHE process model
Advances in Engineering Software
CRIWG'07 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Groupware: design implementation, and use
Tracing the rationale behind UML model change through argumentation
ER'07 Proceedings of the 26th international conference on Conceptual modeling
Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems
ArgMAS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems
USIXML: a language supporting multi-path development of user interfaces
EHCI-DSVIS'04 Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on Engineering Human Computer Interaction and Interactive Systems
Towards argument representational tools for hybrid argumentation systems
HCII'11 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Human interface and the management of information: interacting with information - Volume Part II
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The Task-Oriented and User- CenteredProcess Model for Developing Interfaces for Human-Computer-Human Environments (TOUCHE) is aimed to build up user interfaces for groupware applications under a Human-Computer Interaction perspective. It includes a large set of well known formal models like Class Diagrams, Organizational Structure Diagrams, Task Diagrams, Collaboration Diagrams and Abstract Interaction Objects among others. Most of such models, however, suffer from a number of limitations when formalizing users' commonsense. Over the last few years, Argumentation Systems have been gaining importance in several areas of Artificial Intelligence, mainly as a vehicle for facilitating rationally justifiable decision making when handling incomplete and potentially inconsistent information. This paper sketches a Proof of Concept to show how defeasible argumentation techniques can be embedded within the TOUCHE. The final goal is to enhance the capability of development process models for CSCW systems by including a rule-based approach for efficient reasoning with incomplete and inconsistent information.