CNLS '89 Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference of the Center for Nonlinear Studies on Self-organizing, Collective, and Cooperative Phenomena in Natural and Artificial Computing Networks on Emergent computation
Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
Computer-generated art, music, and literature: philosophical conundrums
ACM SIGART Bulletin
ACM SIGART Bulletin
The Turing test is for the birds
ACM SIGART Bulletin
A formalization of the Turing test
ACM SIGART Bulletin
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
Minds and Machines
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Agent design to pass computer games
ACM-SE 42 Proceedings of the 42nd annual Southeast regional conference
Steve Austin versus the symbol grounding problem
CRPIT '03 Selected papers from conference on Computers and philosophy - Volume 37
First, scale up to the robotic Turing test, then worry about feeling
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Tool use for autonomous agents
AAAI'05 Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Levels of functional equivalence in reverse bioengineering
Artificial Life
Some cognitive aspects of a turing test for children
Proceedings of the 2005 joint Chinese-German conference on Cognitive systems
CDS '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Companionable Dialogue Systems
Some Implications of a Sample of Practical Turing Tests
Minds and Machines
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
It is important to understand that the Turing Test (TT) is not, nor was it intended to be, a trick; how well one can fool someone is not a measure of scientific progress. The TT is an empirical criterion: It sets AI's empirical goal to be to generate human scale performance capacity. This goal will be met when the candidate's performance is totally indistinguishable from a human's. Until then, the TT simply represents what it is that AI must endeavor eventually to accomplish scientifically.