Deriving Safety Cases for the Formal Safety Certification of Automatically Generated Code

  • Authors:
  • Nurlida Basir;Ewen Denney;Bernd Fischer

  • Affiliations:
  • ECS, Southampton University, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK;USRA/RIACS, NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA 94035, USA;ECS, Southampton University, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

  • Venue:
  • Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS)
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We present an approach to systematically derive safety cases for automatically generated code from information collected during a formal, Hoare-style safety certification of the code. This safety case makes explicit the formal and informal reasoning principles, and reveals the top-level assumptions and external dependencies that must be taken into account; however, the evidence still comes from the formal safety proofs. It uses a generic goal-based argument that is instantiated with respect to the certified safety property (i.e., safety claims) and the program. This will be combined with a complementary safety case that argues the safety of the framework itself, in particular the correctness of the Hoare rules with respect to the safety property and the trustworthiness of the certification system and its individual components.