How is meaning grounded in dictionary definitions?

  • Authors:
  • A. Blondin Massé;G. Chicoisne;Y. Gargouri;S. Harnad;O. Picard;O. Marcotte

  • Affiliations:
  • Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal (QC), Canada;Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal (QC), Canada;Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal (QC), Canada;Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal (QC), Canada;Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal (QC), Canada;HEC Montréal, Montréal (Québec), Canada

  • Venue:
  • TextGraphs-3 Proceedings of the 3rd Textgraphs Workshop on Graph-Based Algorithms for Natural Language Processing
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Meaning cannot be based on dictionary definitions all the way down: at some point the circularity of definitions must be broken in some way, by grounding the meanings of certain words in sensorimotor categories learned from experience or shaped by evolution. This is the "symbol grounding problem". We introduce the concept of a reachable set --- a larger vocabulary whose meanings can be learned from a smaller vocabulary through definition alone, as long as the meanings of the smaller vocabulary are themselves already grounded. We provide simple algorithms to compute reachable sets for any given dictionary.