Cost estimation for software development
Cost estimation for software development
Evaluating predictive quality models derived from software measures: lessons learned
Journal of Systems and Software
An assessment and comparison of common software cost estimation modeling techniques
Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering
An analysis of factors affecting software reliability
Journal of Systems and Software
The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Second Edition
The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Second Edition
Software Engineering Economics
Software Engineering Economics
Estimates, Uncertainty, and Risk
IEEE Software
Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Realising evidence-based software engineering
REBSE '05 Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Realising evidence-based software engineering
Combining software evidence: arguments and assurance
REBSE '05 Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Realising evidence-based software engineering
Identifying Risks in XP Projects through Process Modelling
ASWEC '06 Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference
A flexible software process model
A flexible software process model
A Simulation Framework to Support Software Project (Re)Planning
SEAA '09 Proceedings of the 2009 35th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications
Coping with the cone of uncertainty: an empirical study of the SAIV process model
ICSP'07 Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Software process
Reflections on 10 years of software process simulation modeling: a systematic review
ICSP'08 Proceedings of the Software process, 2008 international conference on Making globally distributed software development a success story
Tailor the value-based software quality achievement process to project business cases
SPW/ProSim'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Software Process Simulation and Modeling
A lightweight framework for describing software practices
Journal of Systems and Software
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Existing software process models such as Waterfall and XP are characterised by unstated assumptions, a consequence of which is that we can not easily compare models or transfer data from one model to another. This means that software planners have no mechanism for selecting process activities that are best suited to individual projects. In this paper, we propose a framework for modelling software processes that supports representation and comparison of different kinds of software process. Our framework is based on a lift in focus from 'choosing activities' to 'identifying project objectives and selecting activities to meet those objectives'. We overview some evidence to support the claims of representation and comparison and discuss benefits and limitations of the approach.