What makes a good game?: using reviews to inform design

Authors:
Matthew Bond;Russell Beale
Affiliations:
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK;University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Venue:
Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology
Year:
2009

Citing 2
Cited 2

A Q-study of game player aesthetics

Simulation and Gaming
GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games

Computers in Entertainment (CIE) - Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in Entertainment

Identifying annotations for adventure game generation from fiction text

SAICSIT '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
GameFlow heuristics for designing and evaluating real-time strategy games

Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The characteristics that identify a good game are hard to define and reproduce, as demonstrated by the catalogues of both successes and failures from most games companies. We have started to address this by undertaking a grounded theoretical analysis of reviews garnered from games, both good and bad, to distil from these common features that characterize good and bad games. We have identified that a good game is cohesive, varied, has good user interaction and offers some form of social interaction. The most important factor to avoid is a bad pricing. Successfully achieving some of these good factors will also outweigh problems in other areas.