Improving the Effectiveness of Visual Representations in Requirements Engineering: An Evaluation of i* Visual Syntax

Authors:
Daniel Laurence Moody;Patrick Heymans;Raimundas Matulevicius
Affiliations:
-;-;-
Venue:
RE '09 Proceedings of the 2009 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE
Year:
2009

Citing 0
Cited 6

The "physics" of notations: a scientific approach to designing visual notations in software engineering

Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2
Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 visual notation

SLE'10 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Software language engineering
The impact of perceived cognitive effectiveness on perceived usefulness of visual conceptual modeling languages

ER'11 Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Conceptual modeling
Towards a more semantically transparent i* visual syntax

REFSQ'12 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Requirements Engineering: foundation for software quality
Towards a requirements modeling language for self-adaptive systems

REFSQ'12 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Requirements Engineering: foundation for software quality
Goal-Oriented requirements engineering and enterprise architecture: two case studies and some lessons learned

REFSQ'12 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Requirements Engineering: foundation for software quality

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Goal-oriented modelling is one of the most important research developments in the RE field. This paper conducts a systematic analysis of the visual syntax of i*, one of the leading goal-oriented languages. Like most RE notations, i* is highly visual. Yet surprisingly, there has been little debate about or modification to its graphical conventions since it was proposed more than a decade ago. We evaluate the notation using a set of evidence-based principles for visual notation design. The paper identifies some serious flaws in the i* visual notation together with some recommendations for improvement. A broader goal of the paper is to raise the level of debate and stimulate discussion about visual representation in RE research.